I have been wondering about something. When did our bigger churches plant the most workers? When they were bigger and had nice convention center buildings, or when they were smaller and more agile in how they operated? What I am wondering about is how many of our bigger churches, for whom the flow of pioneer church plants has fallen off, have spent a lot of money on bigger buildings?
Bigger churches with big buildings are good for hosting conferences. But they used to host conferences before they got bogged down with convention center buildings. They made it work. It was exciting. A big building takes away the excitement of seeing a service or a conference packed to the rafters with people. SRO is more exciting than empty seats.
Another thing that I noticed is how some pastors, who seem to miss the exciting days of living on the edge, seem to work hard to try to make it happen again in the new, large building. They talk about the early days a lot. They seem to struggle with how to deal with church life as it is. They travel a lot.
The size of a church is directly linked to the ability of the pastor to minister to the church that the Lord has given him. No matter if that church is 50 people or 500 people or 5000 people, the truth is that the Lord will not waste converts on a man who cannot care for them adequately.
"A man's gift makes room for him, and brings him before great men." Prov.18:16
I once asked pastor Mitchell why our Fellowship had so many small churches. He told me it was because we had so many small men. It is an unfailing rule of God that a church will never rise beyond the ability and the ministry of the men who shepherd God's flock.